|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Agent Framework
Hi, Does it exist an agent framework written in C ? If not, what would you recommend if I want to write some agents or agents-like in C ? I should have something that is difficult to kill. I know that it is not possible to avoid a process to be killed with a kill -9 proc_num command, but is it nevertheless possible to extend the signal handler so that it sends a msg when a process is killed by a SIGKILL signal ? Thanks for your answers. Seeu Chris
On 31 May, 13:50, Einbert <christoph.eh@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > Does it exist an agent framework written in C ?
I'm not sure what you mean by "agent". > If not, what would you recommend if I want to write some agents or > agents-like in C ? > I should have something that is difficult to kill. I know that it is > not possible to avoid a process to be killed with a kill -9 proc_num > command, but is it nevertheless possible to extend the signal handler > so that it sends a msg when a process is killed by a SIGKILL signal ?
You now seem to be talking about Unix daemon processes, but I'm using knowledge that doesn't relate to the C programming language. Loads of information is available, but it relates to Unix programming, not the generalised C programming generally seen as on-topic here. You might do better in somewhere like comp.unix.programmer. <Off-Topic> You could also do some reading - this sounds very much like the sort of thing that Richard Stevens covers in "Advanced Programming in the UNIX Environment"... </Off-Topic>
On 31 mai, 15:20, mark_blue@pobox.com wrote: > On 31 May, 13:50, Einbert <christoph.eh @gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Does it exist an agent framework written in C ? > I'm not sure what you mean by "agent".
Some kind of little program that works on his own, do some stuff and can exchange some information with other agents... For example, as soon as an agent has found some searched information, he tells the others that he found the wanted information... Actually I would need some kind of standalone agents that are not depended of some central management, i.e no single point of failure. > You might do better in somewhere like comp.unix.programmer.
Thanks for the advise :) . I will have a look there. > <Off-Topic> > You could also do some reading - this sounds very much like the sort > of thing that Richard Stevens covers in "Advanced Programming in the > UNIX Environment"... > </Off-Topic>
I have already begun with the reading :) .
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|