|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
cdecl
hi, I know that this may not be the question has to be raised in this group. in comp.lang.c FAQ list Question 1.21 i read about cdecl . i am working with "turbo c" on a windows xp mechine. can any one provide link where i can get the compatable cdecl. i tryed but i could not found it in google search. please help me. thanks to the group and members. regards, prasanth.
shanti wrote: > Question 1.21 i read about cdecl . i > am working with "turbo c" on a windows xp mechine. can any one > provide link where i can get the compatable cdecl.
Read further in the FAQ, the information appears to remain valid. ftp://gatekeeper.dec.com/pub/usenet/comp.sources.unix/volume14/cdecl2
Tim Prince <timothypri @sbcglobal.net> wrote: > shanti wrote: >> Question 1.21 i read about cdecl . i >> am working with "turbo c" on a windows xp mechine. can any one >> provide link where i can get the compatable cdecl. > Read further in the FAQ, the information appears to remain valid. > ftp://gatekeeper.dec.com/pub/usenet/comp.sources.unix/volume14/cdecl2 It would be nice to see intelligent responses to questions in this group. Perhaps someday. For instance, besides noting that the FAQ does not address his question, the cited URL points to a shar file. I suppose the minor details of unpacking the file and making it usable for OP's environment are off-topic. -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net
In article <136808o80jmv@corp.supernews.com>, Thomas Dickey <dic@saltmine.radix.net> wrote: >It would be nice to see intelligent responses to questions in this group. >Perhaps someday. >For instance, besides noting that the FAQ does not address his question, >the cited URL points to a shar file. >I suppose the minor details of unpacking the file and making it usable >for OP's environment are off-topic.
A quick Google suggests that this may be useful for unpacking: http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/sharutils.htm I would be very surprised if cdecl used any non-standard C features, so making it usable should not be a problem. -- Richard -- "Consideration shall be given to the need for as many as 32 characters in some alphabets" - X3.4, 1963.
Richard Tobin <rich @cogsci.ed.ac.uk> wrote: > I would be very surprised if cdecl used any non-standard C features, > so making it usable should not be a problem. X MANIFEST 1 This shipping list X cdecl.1 1 X cdecl.c 2 X cdgram.y 1 X cdlex.l 1 X makefile 1 X testset 1 X testset++ 1 hmm - "non-standard" or unusual. Since it uses lex and yacc, that makes it the former (only in this newsgroup of course). offhand - this isn't the first (or even second) request for this information in this newsgroup in the past month or so. The faq doesn't provide the information requested... -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net
Thomas Dickey wrote: > Richard Tobin <rich @cogsci.ed.ac.uk> wrote: >> I would be very surprised if cdecl used any non-standard C features, >> so making it usable should not be a problem. > X MANIFEST 1 This shipping list > X cdecl.1 1 > X cdecl.c 2 > X cdgram.y 1 > X cdlex.l 1 > X makefile 1 > X testset 1 > X testset++ 1 > hmm - "non-standard" or unusual. Since it uses lex and yacc, > that makes it the former (only in this newsgroup of course). > offhand - this isn't the first (or even second) request for this > information in this newsgroup in the past month or so. > The faq doesn't provide the information requested...
It took me 30 seconds with Google to find a cdecl, and another minute to compile it on Unix. -- clvrmnky <mailto:spamt@clevermonkey.org> Direct replies will be blacklisted. Replace "spamtrap" with my name to contact me directly.
Clever Monkey <spamt @clevermonkey.org.invalid> wrote: > It took me 30 seconds with Google to find a cdecl, and another minute to > compile it on Unix. yawn: if you _were_ a clever monkey, you'd have read OP's request. -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net
shanti <prasanth.than @gmail.com> wrote: > hi, > I know that this may not be the question has to be raised in this > group. in comp.lang.c FAQ list Question 1.21 i read about cdecl . i > am working with "turbo c" on a windows xp mechine. can any one > provide link where i can get the compatable cdecl. i tryed but i > could not found it in google search. please help me. thanks to the > group and members. > regards, > prasanth. actually cdecl's off-topic (mention of tools in the faq doesn't seem to make things on-topic, accurate, or even guarantee that readers of this newsgroup can provide useful information about them ;-). Some people might choose to compile it (awkward if you don't have a source). It's a useful learning exercise (but doesn't bear much on the "C" language). Finding "cdecl" on Windows is complicated in a web-search since some compiler headers contain a matching keyword. However, a web-search is more reliable than asking in a newsgroup such as this. Trying "cdecl.zip", which gives several likely hits, but it appears they're for MS-DOS (likely to be a problem on anything newer than the FAQ, which generally provides at best ten-year-old information). But that's the easiest route. I'd simply compile it if I had a use for it - requires lex and yacc. "turbo c" should be able to build those - (flex 2.54a and yacc). -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net
Richard Tobin <rich @cogsci.ed.ac.uk> wrote: > I would be very surprised if cdecl used any non-standard C features, > so making it usable should not be a problem. it uses getopt (nonstandard in this newsgroup ;-) For OP that would be another problem, of course. -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net
In article <1368r7foehue@corp.supernews.com>, Thomas Dickey <dic@saltmine.radix.net> wrote: >it uses getopt (nonstandard in this newsgroup ;-) >For OP that would be another problem, of course.
Not really. Look more closely at the code: #ifndef NOGETOPT extern int optind; #else /* This is a miniature version of getopt() which will */ /* do just barely enough for us to get by below. */ /* Options are not allowed to be bunched up together. */ /* Option arguments are not supported. */ int optind = 1; [...] -- Richard -- "Consideration shall be given to the need for as many as 32 characters in some alphabets" - X3.4, 1963.
On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 12:10:00 -0000, Thomas Dickey
<dic @saltmine.radix.net> wrote: >Tim Prince <timothypri @sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> shanti wrote: >>> Question 1.21 i read about cdecl . i >>> am working with "turbo c" on a windows xp mechine. can any one >>> provide link where i can get the compatable cdecl. >> Read further in the FAQ, the information appears to remain valid. >> ftp://gatekeeper.dec.com/pub/usenet/comp.sources.unix/volume14/cdecl2 >It would be nice to see intelligent responses to questions in this group. >Perhaps someday. >For instance, besides noting that the FAQ does not address his question, >the cited URL points to a shar file. >I suppose the minor details of unpacking the file and making it usable >for OP's environment are off-topic.
Hi Tim, I wrote a Windows GUI front-end for cdecl back in 2001. It was non-trivial to get the original source to compile, but I finally got it working. The brains of this app are not of my doing, but rather of the cdecl source code. If anyone is interested, you can download it here: http://www.smartcache.net/cdecl/WinCdecl.zip This is an MFC app that should run on any version of Windows 95 or later (even Windows Vista). Linux users should be able to run it under Wine. Comments, suggestions, and bug reports can be sent to i@smartcache.net. Best regards -- jay
jaysome <jays @hotmail.com> writes: [...] > I wrote a Windows GUI front-end for cdecl back in 2001. It was > non-trivial to get the original source to compile, but I finally got > it working. The brains of this app are not of my doing, but rather of > the cdecl source code. > If anyone is interested, you can download it here: > http://www.smartcache.net/cdecl/WinCdecl.zip > This is an MFC app that should run on any version of Windows 95 or > later (even Windows Vista). Linux users should be able to run it under > Wine.
I just tried it. Unless I'm missing something, it implements the equivalent of "explain" but not "declare". In other words: % cdecl Type `help' or `?' for help cdecl> explain int *x declare x as pointer to int cdecl> declare y as pointer to char char *y cdecl> Your WinCdecl handles the first, but not the second. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) k@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst> San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst> "We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this." -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"
jaysome wrote: ... snip ... > I wrote a Windows GUI front-end for cdecl back in 2001. It was > non-trivial to get the original source to compile, but I finally > got it working. The brains of this app are not of my doing, but > rather of the cdecl source code. > If anyone is interested, you can download it here: > http://www.smartcache.net/cdecl/WinCdecl.zip > This is an MFC app that should run on any version of Windows 95 > or later (even Windows Vista). Linux users should be able to run > it under Wine.
What is the point? You can always open a text window, even under Vista, and just run cdecl. No clutter, or guiness, involved. IMO. -- <http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.txt> <http://www.securityfocus.com/columnists/423> <http://www.aaxnet.com/editor/edit043.html> <http://kadaitcha.cx/vista/dogsbreakfast/index.html> cbfalconer at maineline dot net -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 01:41:22 -0700, Keith Thompson <k@mib.org> wrote:
>jaysome <jays @hotmail.com> writes: >[...] >> I wrote a Windows GUI front-end for cdecl back in 2001. It was >> non-trivial to get the original source to compile, but I finally got >> it working. The brains of this app are not of my doing, but rather of >> the cdecl source code. >> If anyone is interested, you can download it here: >> http://www.smartcache.net/cdecl/WinCdecl.zip >> This is an MFC app that should run on any version of Windows 95 or >> later (even Windows Vista). Linux users should be able to run it under >> Wine. >I just tried it. Unless I'm missing something, it implements the >equivalent of "explain" but not "declare". In other words: >% cdecl >Type `help' or `?' for help >cdecl> explain int *x >declare x as pointer to int >cdecl> declare y as pointer to char >char *y >cdecl> >Your WinCdecl handles the first, but not the second.
You're right. Somehow I uploaded an old version. I found a newer version that handles explain, declare and cast and uploaded it. I'll talk to smartcache and see if I can upload the source as well this weekend. http://www.smartcache.net/cdecl/WinCdecl.zip -- jay
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|