|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
some new questions for c
for all : who are the best experts for c in the world?why ?what are they doing now?
for all : who are the best experts for c in the world?why ?what are they doing now?
for all : who are the best experts for c in the world?why ?what are they doing now?
In article <1180321971.141984.41@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, <zhaowei0 @163.com> wrote: >for all : >who are the best experts for c in the world?why ?what are they doing >now? What are they doing now? Probably watching Sunday evening sports, or having desert after supper, or reading their kids to sleep. Some of them are probably half-waking and telling their husbands "Not now, honey, I'm not in the mood right now!" Why, if you were one of the best C experts in the world, what would you be doing on a Sunday night or in the early hours of Monday morning? -- "It is important to remember that when it comes to law, computers never make copies, only human beings make copies. Computers are given commands, not permission. Only people can be given permission." -- Brad Templeton
Walter Roberson wrote: > In article <1180321971.141984.41 @d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, > <zhaowei0 @163.com> wrote: >> for all : >> who are the best experts for c in the world?why ?what are they doing >> now? > What are they doing now? Probably watching Sunday evening sports, > or having desert after supper, or reading their kids to sleep. > Some of them are probably half-waking and telling their husbands > "Not now, honey, I'm not in the mood right now!" > Why, if you were one of the best C experts in the world, what would > you be doing on a Sunday night or in the early hours of Monday morning?
Or even Monday afternoon! -- Ian Collins.
zhaowei0@163.com : > for all : > who are the best experts for c in the world?why ?what are they doing > now?
<zhaowei0 @163.com> wrote in message news:1180321971.141984.41740@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com... > for all : > who are the best experts for c in the world?why ?what are they doing > now?
Dennis Ritchie is the inventor of C and I suppose the person you would identify as the best expert. He used to work at AT&T, I don't know what he does now but he posts here occasionally. The question isn't really meaningful, since one of the goals of a programming language is that it should be easy for an experienced programmer to learn. Often the goal is also that it should be easy for an inexperienced person to learn. So really if you need an "expert" then that reflects badly on the language. However you can also have expert programmers. These are people who might well not know all the minutae of the C standard but are very good at getting computers to do difficult things. -- Free games and programming goodies. http://www.personal.leeds.ac.uk/~bgy1mm
In article <1180321962.481152.9@r19g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, zhaowei0@163.com writes >for all : >who are the best experts for c in the world?why ?what are they doing >now?
Me Because I am wonderful Drinking coffee. Next! That was easy... :-) There are some knowledgeable People on here but the real experts aren't in this NG they tend to be on c.l.c.m and the standards groups. That is for C as a language. IF you want C as applied in specific applications/targets etc there are other better NG's -- \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/ /\/\/ c@phaedsys.org www.phaedsys.org \/\/\ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
zhaowei0 @163.com wrote: > for all : > who are the best experts for c in the world?why ?what are they doing > now? Right now, they are probably reading your message and wondering whether they are, indeed, "the best experts for c in the world". Cheers, mvdw (not one of the best experts in the world at anything, most likely)
Chris Hills said: > There are some knowledgeable People on here but the real experts > aren't in this NG
Well, if you don't count Chris Torek as an expert, my estimation of your ability to recognise expertise has just plummeted. -- Richard Heathfield "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999 http://www.cpax.org.uk email: rjh at the above domain, - www.
Chris Hills wrote: ... snip ... > There are some knowledgeable People on here but the real experts > aren't in this NG they tend to be on c.l.c.m and the standards > groups. That is for C as a language. IF you want C as applied in > specific applications/targets etc there are other better NG's
You are mistaken. c.l.c.m handles largely the same group, but with much smaller volume, since it takes so long for messages to propagate. comp.stds.c deals with the verbiage in the standards, modifications thereto, etc. c.l.c deals with the language as defined by the standard. -- <http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.txt> <http://www.securityfocus.com/columnists/423> <http://www.aaxnet.com/editor/edit043.html> <http://kadaitcha.cx/vista/dogsbreakfast/index.html> cbfalconer at maineline dot net -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Chris Hills wrote: > There are some knowledgeable People on here but the real experts aren't > in this NG
P. J. Plauger post here sometimes, but of course, more compiler writers and kernel hackers hang out over in comp.std.c. -- Tor <torust [at] online [dot] no>
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|