Just curious as to other's results.
We have two large optical analysis codes which crunch numbers and do
I/O which test about 30-40% faster when compiled in IVF rather than
CVF. One uses Winteracter and one just calls the Windows APIs
We have a small number crunching test code which shows the two codes
generate EXEs of about the same speed.
We are building stand alone .EXEs without the .NET thing.
I'd love to get other's results when switching or thinking about
switching from CVF to IVF.
IVF and CVF both seem to be very good compilers and they both work
well with Lawson Wakefields super great Winteracter code which I use
for GUI and graphics.
James E. Klein
Engineering Calculations is the home of
the KDP-2 Optical Design Program
1-818-507-5706 (Voice and Fax)
"KDP2, not quite easy enough for a Caveman to use" :-)