Home     |     .Net Programming    |     cSharp Home    |     Sql Server Home    |     Javascript / Client Side Development     |     Ajax Programming

Ruby on Rails Development     |     Perl Programming     |     C Programming Language     |     C++ Programming     |     IT Jobs

Python Programming Language     |     Laptop Suggestions?    |     TCL Scripting     |     Fortran Programming     |     Scheme Programming Language


 
 
Cervo Technologies
The Right Source to Outsource

MS Dynamics CRM 3.0

Perl Programming Language

FAQ 9.1 What is the correct form of response from a CGI script?


This is an excerpt from the latest version perlfaq9.pod, which
comes with the standard Perl distribution. These postings aim to
reduce the number of repeated questions as well as allow the community
to review and update the answers. The latest version of the complete
perlfaq is at http://faq.perl.org .

--------------------------------------------------------------------

9.1: What is the correct form of response from a CGI script?

    (Alan Flavell <flavell+@a5.ph.gla.ac.uk> answers...)

    The Common Gateway Interface (CGI) specifies a software interface
    between a program ("CGI script") and a web server (HTTPD). It is not
    specific to Perl, and has its own FAQs and tutorials, and usenet group,
    comp.infosystems.www.authoring.cgi

    The CGI specification is outlined in an informational RFC:
    http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3875

    Other relevant documentation listed in:
    http://www.perl.org/CGI_MetaFAQ.html

    These Perl FAQs very selectively cover some CGI issues. However, Perl
    programmers are strongly advised to use the CGI.pm module, to take care
    of the details for them.

    The similarity between CGI response headers (defined in the CGI
    specification) and HTTP response headers (defined in the HTTP
    specification, RFC2616) is intentional, but can sometimes be confusing.

    The CGI specification defines two kinds of script: the "Parsed Header"
    script, and the "Non Parsed Header" (NPH) script. Check your server
    documentation to see what it supports. "Parsed Header" scripts are
    simpler in various respects. The CGI specification allows any of the
    usual newline representations in the CGI response (it's the server's job
    to create an accurate HTTP response based on it). So "\n" written in
    text mode is technically correct, and recommended. NPH scripts are more
    tricky: they must put out a complete and accurate set of HTTP
    transaction response headers; the HTTP specification calls for records
    to be terminated with carriage-return and line-feed, i.e ASCII \015\012
    written in binary mode.

    Using CGI.pm gives excellent platform independence, including EBCDIC
    systems. CGI.pm selects an appropriate newline representation
    ($CGI::CRLF) and sets binmode as appropriate.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

The perlfaq-workers, a group of volunteers, maintain the perlfaq. They
are not necessarily experts in every domain where Perl might show up,
so please include as much information as possible and relevant in any
corrections. The perlfaq-workers also don't have access to every
operating system or platform, so please include relevant details for
corrections to examples that do not work on particular platforms.
Working code is greatly appreciated.

If you'd like to help maintain the perlfaq, see the details in
perlfaq.pod.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

In article <6kogj4-gdf.@blue.stonehenge.com>, PerlFAQ Server

That last sentence is not punctuated correctly. I suggest:

"It is not specific to Perl and has its own FAQs, tutorials, and usenet
group (comp.infosystems.www.authoring.cgi)."

 Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------        
                http://www.usenet.com

Jim Gibson wrote:
> That last sentence is not punctuated correctly. I suggest:

> "It is not specific to Perl and has its own FAQs, tutorials, and usenet
> group (comp.infosystems.www.authoring.cgi)."

The punctuation left aside, ciwac is still broken, isn't it?

--
Gunnar Hjalmarsson
Email: http://www.gunnar.cc/cgi-bin/contact.pl

Add to del.icio.us | Digg this | Stumble it | Powered by Megasolutions Inc