The ODIOUS WASPs of FBI (FEDERAL BUREAU OF INCOMPETENCE) can ONLY S-T-
WASPS ONLY STING
WASPS ONLY STING
The fact is that the ANTHRAX mailer was a WASP BASTARD being covered
up by the YANK Bastards at FBI. Mueller is DAMN Incompetent and
Coward. Bush's Crimes against the Nation tower far higher than those
of NIXON. Long time ago, when FBI had a competent and PATRIOTIC chief,
he was able to get the NIXON BASTARD out of the office and exiled to
If I found out some five FOOLISH PATSIES, Immigrants under mental or
social imbalance were planning a STUPID and IDIOTIC operation, I would
confront them with courtesy. I would tell them that this is a foolish
act. That I, a white FBI officer am doing them a favor out of the
goodness of my heart to not do such a foolish thing and give the YANK
SOBs an excuse for genocide and stealing their oil wealth by PERPETUAL
WAR of FAKE and SYNTHETIC TERROR.
Thats how a good school master would confront a few stupid kids and
that is the way to solve this problem.
On the other hand, a HEINOUS and RACIST crime was committed in 911
CONTROLLED DEMOLITION as well as mailing those FAKE "Allah" letters
with GENUINE ANTHRAX through out the country by a yank motherfucker
related to the NATIONAL LABS and the ANGLO-SAXON-ZIONIST
America is run by ANTI-CHRIST Fascists like Bush, Cheney, who have
womanized profusely, as Bush. Neil Bush was involved in ADULTERY and
so was NEWT GINGRICH. Then there are child molesters. Cheney's
daughter is LESBIAN. These are out and out HYPOCRITES. They are
FOOLING American people for their OWN luxuries and style of life.
Killing them in Iraq. If you die for their lifestyle, you died as a
1) Ask FBI criminal and incompetent bastards just one question: Where
is the anthrax mailer? because that would lead to the Bush-Cheney-
2) The papers below are testimonials as well as extensive 911 footage
and material on 911blogger.com and other 911 websites.
Research in Political Economy
Copyright =A9 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
The Hidden History of 9-11-2001
Edited by: Paul Zarembka
Part I: Hijackers - Who Were They?
Inconsistencies and contradictions in the US government's story of
hijackers and their masterminds are examined to account for what
happened on 9-11. A little-known initial FBI list of 19, scrutinized
for four names not on its final list, calls into question the FBI
naming process. We discovered 11 of the FBI-named finalists could not
have been on those planes, with 10 still alive and another's identity
improvised by a double. The Dulles videotape, essentially the
government's case that hijackers boarded the 9-11 flights, is found to
have serious problems including authentication, as does the so-called
bin Laden "confession" video.
Were "hijackers" known to be in the US before intelligence alleges it
knew? Evidence is examined which shows that they were closely
monitored by agencies which denied this knowledge; in particular, an
undercover FBI agent lived with them the prior year.
Noting government refusal to disclose evidence called for by
investigators, we find some pieces altered or fabricated and others
confiscated or destroyed. Other revelations point to hijackers with
national security overrides, protection in their alternate roles as
drug traffickers, and deep political connections with government
elites. We investigate patterns, reminiscent of historical
intelligence involvement, revealing the presence of a covert
intelligence operation disguised as an outside enemy attack.
Part II: The Morning of 9-11-2001
4. Initiation of the 9-11 Operation, with Evidence of Insider Trading
This chapter first examines evidence concerning departures of the four
flights out of Boston, D.C., and Newark, including identifications of
the aircrafts involved, some evidence regarding the flight paths, and
then the hijackings. Alleged video evidence at airports for the
hijackers themselves is examined, but found to be unacceptable.
The fact of a conspiracy is uncontested by all. Three alternative
conspiracy possibilities regarding the planes are examined: the
'official' one of suicide hijackers skillfully guiding planes with
steeled determination into targets (independent of the hijackers'
identities); use of beaconing or electronic control, similar to
ordinary commercial landings, into the targets; and use of 'drone'
airplanes. The third alternative is not supportable at this time, but
the other two are possible explanations, not necessarily equally
The issue of insider trading before 9-11 is addressed. Publicly
available data from OptionMetrics are provided and analyzed,
indicating that many early reports were not using accurate data.
Turning to an academic study in the Journal of Business which relies
upon confidential, superior data, the findings are summarized that,
indeed, there is evidence of insider trading before 9-11 on American
Airlines and United Airlines. Larger concerns of insider trading are
also summarized. Lastly, we give brief consideration to the profits
certain capitalists make out of 9-11.
5. The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account
Cannot Be True
David Ray Griffin
I argue that the official story about the collapses of the Twin Towers
and building 7 of the World Trade Center, according to which the
collapses were caused by fire - combined, in the case of the Twin
Towers, with the effects of the airplane impacts - cannot be true, for
two major reasons. One reason is that fire has never, except allegedly
three times on 9/11, caused the total collapse of steel-frame high-
rise buildings. All (other) such collapses have been produced by the
use of explosives in the procedure known as "controlled demolition."
The other major problem is that the collapses of all three buildings
had at least 11 features that would be expected if, and only if,
explosives had been used.
I also show the importance of the recently released of 9/11 Oral
Histories recorded by the New York Fire Department. With regard to the
Twin Towers, many of the firefighters and medical workers said they
observed multiple explosions and other phenomena indicative of
controlled demolition. With regard to building 7, many testimonies
point to widespread foreknowledge that the building was going to
collapse, and some of the testimonies contradict the official story
that this anticipation of the building's collapse was based on
objective indications. These testimonies further strengthen the
already virtually conclusive case that all three buildings were
brought down by explosives.
I conclude by calling on the New York Times, which got the 9/11 Oral
Histories released, now to complete the task of revealing the truth
6. The Military Drills on 9-11: "Bizarre Coincidence" or Something
Four Arrows (aka Don Jacobs)
Short-term military simulations of scenarios or conditions that U.S.
military personnel might meet are generally the largest, in terms of
cost and personnel, of all operational training events. That at least
six such exercises were scheduled for September 11, 2001 raises
serious questions about whether or not the events of 9/11 were at
least partially orchestrated by U.S. command.
In light of the aforementioned military exercises and the fact that
the 9/11 Commission's Final Report barely mentions them, neither were
they significantly discussed nor investigated during the hearings,
this essay briefly explores four key questions that will hopefully
stimulate further inquiries, investigations and perhaps subpoenas that
will ultimately break the silence and force declassification of the
information surrounding the war games.
1) Has there been a high-level suppression of information about the
2) Might the military drills have been a significant factor in the
success of the attacks?
3) Who was in charge of the military drills and what motives may have
been operating for this person?
4) In what way might Zacarias Moussaoui, the only person charged in
the United States for the attacks, be a link that connects to the
person in charge of the games to another tragedy that may have been
"an inside job" - i.e. Senator Paul Wellstone's death, and how might
Moussaoui connect all of this to the Pentagon?
Part III: The Context of 9-11-2001 and Meaning for the Future
7. Terrorism and Statecraft: Al-Qaeda and Western Covert Operations
after the Cold War
Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed
Al-Qaeda is conventionally portrayed as a monolithic, hierarchical
organization whose activities - coordinated by the network's leader
Osama bin Laden - are the source of international terrorism today. Al-
Qaeda is considered a radical tendency within the broader Islamist
Salafi movement, legitimizing its terrorist operations as a global
Islamist jihad against Western civilization. Al-Qaeda's terrorist
activity today is considered, "blowback" from long finished CIA and
western covert operations in Afghanistan.
The conventional wisdom is demonstrably false. After the Cold War,
Western connections with al-Qaeda proliferated around the world,
challenging mainstream conceptions of al-Qaeda's identity. Western
covert operations and military - intelligence connections in strategic
regions show that "al-Qaeda" is a network whose raison d'etre and
modus operandi are inextricably embedded in a disturbing conglomerate
of international Western diplomatic, financial, military and
intelligence policies today. US, British, and Western power routinely
manipulates al-Qaeda through a complex network of state-regional and
human nodes. Such manipulation extended directly to the 9-11
hijackers, and thus to the events of 9-11 itself.1
8. September 11 as "Machiavellian State Terror"
Pyrotechnic effects and