|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Python Programming Language
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
excel library without COM
Hi,
is there any library to help me write excel files without using win
com? because i'll be working on linux platform. At the same time I
could want to perform some formatting, merging of cells. adding sheets
and etc ...
Thanks
james
On Jun 3, 7:59 pm, james_027 <cai.hai@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > is there any library to help me write excel files without using win
> com? because i'll be working on linux platform. At the same time I
> could want to perform some formatting, merging of cells. adding sheets
> and etc ...
> Thanks
> james
topic and it mentions using html or txt files as possibilities:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2002-April/138748.html
I would also think that you could write some kind of custom XML parser/
creator that you could use to create the Excel sheet's structure and
then interface with COM later.
Mike
On Jun 3, 6:59 pm, james_027 <cai.hai@gmail.com> wrote:
> is there any library to help me write excel files without using win
> com?
One option is:
https://secure.simplistix.co.uk/svn/xlwt/trunk
i think this one works pretty nice: http://www.python.org/pypi/xlrd
Happy hacking,
Yuce
On Jun 4, 3:59 am, james_027 <cai.hai@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > is there any library to help me write excel files without using win
> com? because i'll be working on linux platform. At the same time I
> could want to perform some formatting, merging of cells. adding sheets
> and etc ...
> Thanks
> james
On Jun 4, 3:52 pm, yuce <yucete@gmail.com> wrote:
Sure does :-) However the "rd" in "xlrd" is short for "ReaD". As
Waldemar suggested, "xlwt" ("wt" as in WriTe) is more like what the OP
needs.
Cheers,
John
On Jun 4, 8:16 pm, John Machin <sjmac@lexicon.net> wrote:
> On Jun 4, 3:52 pm, yuce <yucete @gmail.com> wrote: > > i think this one works pretty nice:http://www.python.org/pypi/xlrd
> Sure does :-) However the "rd" in "xlrd" is short for "ReaD". As
> Waldemar suggested, "xlwt" ("wt" as in WriTe) is more like what the OP
> needs.
> Cheers,
> John
the module seems to be not active anymore? or updated? It is because
it really stable and has most of the features needed?
Thanks
james
On Jun 5, 1:04 pm, james_027 <cai.hai@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 4, 8:16 pm, John Machin <sjmac @lexicon.net> wrote: > > On Jun 4, 3:52 pm, yuce <yucete@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > i think this one works pretty nice:http://www.python.org/pypi/xlrd
> > Sure does :-) However the "rd" in "xlrd" is short for "ReaD". As
> > Waldemar suggested, "xlwt" ("wt" as in WriTe) is more like what the OP
> > needs.
> > Cheers,
> > John
> Thanks to all who have contributed. I have one concern though. Many of
> the module seems to be not active anymore? or updated? It is because
> it really stable and has most of the features needed?
outing Real Soon Now (after xlrd 0.6.1 final, which is expected Truly
Rooly Real Soon Now).
On Jun 5, 6:17 pm, John Machin <sjmac@lexicon.net> wrote:
> On Jun 5, 1:04 pm, james_027 <cai.hai @gmail.com> wrote: > > On Jun 4, 8:16 pm, John Machin <sjmac@lexicon.net> wrote:
> > > On Jun 4, 3:52 pm, yuce <yucete@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > i think this one works pretty nice:http://www.python.org/pypi/xlrd
> > > Sure does :-) However the "rd" in "xlrd" is short for "ReaD". As
> > > Waldemar suggested, "xlwt" ("wt" as in WriTe) is more like what the OP
> > > needs.
> > > Cheers,
> > > John
> > Thanks to all who have contributed. I have one concern though. Many of
> > the module seems to be not active anymore? or updated? It is because
> > it really stable and has most of the features needed?
> xlwt is active, stable enough for heavy use, and will get a public
> outing Real Soon Now (after xlrd 0.6.1 final, which is expected Truly
> Rooly Real Soon Now).
Now my searching is over
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add to del.icio.us |
Digg this |
Stumble it |
Powered by Megasolutions Inc