Python Programming Language
is it possible to remove the ':' symbol in the end of lines starting with 'if', 'while' etc?
I don't know to which forum should I post the message
I hope someone related to the Python kernel development will read &
consider the idea
I'm (a former? meanwhile not sure) MATLAB user & it's very annoing
typing each time for example
of course if all is written in a single line ':' I guess should not be
Thank you for you suggestions.
Sorry my bad English.
Won't happen. There have been plenty of discussions about this, and while
> I don't know to which forum should I post the message
> I hope someone related to the Python kernel development will read &
> consider the idea
> I'm (a former? meanwhile not sure) MATLAB user & it's very annoing
> typing each time for example
> while i:
> print i
> instead of
> while i
> print i
> of course if all is written in a single line ':' I guess should not be
technically not necessary, the colon is usually considered "optically
pleasing". So - it will stay.
See - one of a bazillion - discussions here:
On Feb 22, 9:49 am, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
Think on the bright side:
you have to type ":" at the beginning of loop and conditional blocks,
but you don't have to type "end" at the end... you are still saving
On 22 Feb, 11:49, email@example.com wrote:
Just a thought...
I've also just made the jump from Matlab to Python (or am straddling
the two at the moment!) and I find the ':' really useful for
delimiting blocks of code. Took a while to get used to it but I reckon
it helps me explain my code to non-programmers as they can see the
blocks I use.
No, there no profits:
> Think on the bright side:
> you have to type ":" at the beginning of loop and conditional blocks,
> but you don't have to type "end" at the end... you are still saving
> two strokes...
instead of 'end' I must type <shift>, ':' and backspace in the end of
block - so 3 keypress are used, same as 'end'
Of course Python is much more better in syntax vs C/C++ but I would
prefere tcl-style or caml-style
x = fun arg1 arg2 ... argn
however, in tcl annoing things are 'set' and 'expr'
and in ocaml '<-' and 'let x = ... in' - too many keypress instead of
but their func calls still is better then fun(arg1, arg2, ..., argn)
and help _something_ or which _something_ in MATLAB is much more
better then help(_something_) in Python
the only bad thing in MATLAB (+absence of x = fun arg1 arg2 ... argn
call) is indexing arrays by () instead of  - holding shift key
dozens times per day is very unconvinient.
And in Python vs MATLAB is very unconvinient arrays creation.
I'm very afraid of proposition that I noticed at
Base multidimensional array type for Python core
Mentor: Travis E. Oliphant
I don't know about anyone mentioned but I'm not sure this is a good
idea to hire ordinary student for such important thing.
And writing 'dimarray(...)' dozens times per day is much more bad than
x = matrix('...'), x = array([...]) or, of course, MATLAB-style x = [1
I guess it should 10 times more think about the array and make it once
and forever - Python already has some array-related classes and all
with syntax much more bad than MATLAB. I guess there should be only 2
types: one for storing data in convinient way without reallocating
(something like C++ STL vector<>) and one for quick calculations
(something like C++ valarray).
Its a compromise in that python has way-less of this kind of cruft than
a lot of other languages.
Tip: don't try learning perl.
I agree the colon is largely redundant, but it's not unreasonable.
On 2007-02-22, tac-tics <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
A certain amount of redundancy in languages (artificial or
> Tip: don't try learning perl.
> I agree the colon is largely redundant, but it's not
natrual) is a good thing. It makes error detection and
correction far easier.
Grant Edwards grante Yow! ... I think I'm
at having an overnight
visi.com sensation right now!!
"Diez B. Roggisch" <email@example.com> wrote:
8< ---------------- request to remove colon ----------------------
> Won't happen. There have been plenty of discussions about this, and while It is also used by text editors to make indentation of the next line happen...
> technically not necessary, the colon is usually considered "optically
> pleasing". So - it will stay.