hmm, my classes are structured as:
Robert Klemme wrote:
> On 05.06.2007 16:45, Michael Artz wrote:
>> I'm needing to implement a deep copy operation on a couple of objects,
>> and was wondering if there was a "best practices" for this sort of
>> thing. I've seen the Marshal.load(Marshal.dump()) idiom, but I'm using
>> singleton classes which can't be dumped.
> It seems they can be dumped - but you get another instance:
.. and ...
c = A::B::C.new
.. seems to work just fine, so I'm not quite sure what is going on with
my code, as I still get a "TypeError: singleton can't be dumped" from
Marshal.dump. I'll have to play around with it a bit more.
> You can use #instance_variable_get and #instance_variable_set to access Sweet, thanks!
> Did you consider overriding #dup and / or #clone for this? Typically Yeah, but I can't seem to wrap my head around the recursive cloning.
> you would not want a cloned / duped instance to refer to the original
> instance's instance variables (at least if they are mutable like
> collections, strings and other objects).
For example, in the above scenarion (A::B::C), how do I allocate space
for the new object without calling clone/dup? I.e, I'm sure that you
realize the problem with the following:
other = self.clone
So how do I get the "other" object within the clone method? Do I need
to allow my initialize method to take in an object of the same type and
perform all the work of the clone method, or is there a better way?
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.