Home     |     .Net Programming    |     cSharp Home    |     Sql Server Home    |     Javascript / Client Side Development     |     Ajax Programming

Ruby on Rails Development     |     Perl Programming     |     C Programming Language     |     C++ Programming     |     IT Jobs

Python Programming Language     |     Laptop Suggestions?    |     TCL Scripting     |     Fortran Programming     |     Scheme Programming Language


 
 
Cervo Technologies
The Right Source to Outsource

MS Dynamics CRM 3.0

TCL(Tool Command Language) Scripting

Add frame(s) to existing window?


I currently invoke a window with a set of radio buttons to select a
project, a text widget to enter a name and a set of checkbuttons to
add properties to a file.  So far so good.

However, the file to which I want to add properties, may already have
some added from an earlier run of my script, so I want to grey out
those checkbuttons with -state disabled.

This gives me a catch 22 situation because the project radio button &
text widget are needed to point to the file to which the properties
are to be added.

So, I would like to declare the project & label as " "  or something
like that, and then test them to ensure I have a valid radio selection
and text widget; this would then allow a action button to be pressed
which then reads the file to discover which properties are already
set; this would then add more frame(s) to the window (if is this
possible), with the checkbutton choices, but with already selected
ones greyed out.

Can all this be done, or do I need to invoke another subsiduary
window?

TIA, Niv.

On 21 May 2007 07:17:00 -0700, Niv <kev.pars@mbda.co.uk> wrote:

This can certainly be done. A small example of a button that will
create a new frame is shown below. In general Tk widgets can be
created (text, label, frame etc), shown (pack, grid and place), hidden
(pack forget, grid forget etc) and destroyed (destroy $widget)
dynamically.

Mark

proc createFrame {} {
  frame .f
  text .f.t
  pack .f
  pack .f.t
  .b configure -state disabled

}

button .b -text "create frame" -command createFrame
pack .b
On 22 May, 14:22, Mark Janssen <mpc.jans@gmail.com> wrote:

That sort of makes sense, however, what I'm trying to do (and failing
miserably) is to open a new window with a button, (which works OK),
this new window has a set of radio buttons and text entry widget, and
another button, say "X", (there are other buttons to return or quit).

Now pressing "X" tests that a radiobutton is selected, the text entry
is not empty, AND the radio button and text entered map to an existing
file, (this all works so far);  assuming this all passes, I then want
to remove the radio buttons & txt entry widget, rename the "X" button
and give it a different command, and finally add in a new set of check
buttons (possibly several sets).

The bit I'm struggling with is modifying the existing window so it re-
maps button "X" with new text and new associated command.

TIA, Niv  (Kev Parsons).

On May 24, 2:05 pm, Niv <kev.pars@mbda.co.uk> wrote:

You don't have to remap the button to change the text or command.
Instead you can use (assumming .b is the X button)

.b configure -text $newText -command $newCommand

Mark

You don't need to rename a widget (nor is that even possible). There are
a couple of easy solutions.

One, simply reconfigure the button:

     .xbutton configure -text "new Label" -command "newCommand"

The second, which I personally think is better, is to have two buttons.
Then, unmap one and map the other:

     button .b1 -text "Button 1" -command "command1"
     button .b2 -text "Button 2" -command "command2"
     ...
     if {$someCondition} {
         grid remove .b1
         grid .b2
     }

It's a tiny bit more complicated than that, but that's the gist. You can
grid two widgets in the same place, then "grid remove" one or the other
and it will remember where to go when you re-grid it.

Of course, if they are both the same size and both in the same place you
can simply raise one over the other.

We can give a more specific example if you wish, but I recommend you
give it a try yourself first.

--
Bryan Oakley
http://www.tclscripting.com

On 24 May, 17:42, Bryan Oakley <oak@bardo.clearlight.com> wrote:

Thanks a lot Brian, I'll give it a whirl and see how I get on.

Kev P.

Brian,

I am curious to know why you would think the two widget approach is
better. Maybe because of debugging? (one button always has the same command)

Mark

Mark Janssen wrote:
> Bryan Oakley wrote:
>> Niv wrote:
<snip>

> Brian,

<snip>

Sorry, Bryan

I'm not sure I could describe my reasoning in a short paragraph. I just
think it's cleaner to have 1 button -> 1 function.

Consider a scenario where you may need to disable feature A but leave
feature B. If both features share the same button you can't just do
".button configure -state disabled" because you may be disabling the
wrong thing. You would have to first check which feature is tied to the
button then decide whether to change the state or not.

--
Bryan Oakley
http://www.tclscripting.com

On 24 May, 19:19, Bryan Oakley <oak@bardo.clearlight.com> wrote:

I'm having great difficulty getting this working completely:

I have two buttons, declared as $k6.b1 & $k6.b2

(where k6 is set as follows:  set k2  [frame .reuse.frm2  -bd 2 -
relief groove])

The .b1 appears OK and invokes a proc which tests if a radiobutton and
text-entry are a valid pair, and then, if OK, overwrites .b1
with .b2 , which works fine.

However at this point I also want the proc to remove frames .k1 & .k2
which hold the radio buttons and the text-entry widgets, and place a
set of already defined frames with check-buttons: k3a, k3b etc, into
the window.  .k1 & .k2 do disappear, but .k3a etc do not appear.
Can you offer any further help please?

TIA , Kev P.

On 25 May, 13:05, Niv <kev.pars@mbda.co.uk> wrote:

Ignore last post please.

I was not placing the frames k3a, k3b etc with grid before placingthe
buttons within the frame.

DOH!

Kev P.

Add to del.icio.us | Digg this | Stumble it | Powered by Megasolutions Inc