Home     |     .Net Programming    |     cSharp Home    |     Sql Server Home    |     Javascript / Client Side Development     |     Ajax Programming

Ruby on Rails Development     |     Perl Programming     |     C Programming Language     |     C++ Programming     |     IT Jobs

Python Programming Language     |     Laptop Suggestions?    |     TCL Scripting     |     Fortran Programming     |     Scheme Programming Language


 
 
Cervo Technologies
The Right Source to Outsource

MS Dynamics CRM 3.0

TCL(Tool Command Language) Scripting

Bypassing rename traces, feature or bug?


The script below uses a detour to rename a proc. This detour does not
trigger any rename traces, as would have occurred if [rename name_1
name_2] had been used.

Is that intended behaviour? (i.o.w. is a follow up as a bug report desired?)

Erik
====

% proc name_1 {} {}
% proc handleCmdTrace {args} {puts $args}
% trace add command name_1 delete handleCmdTrace
% trace add command name_1 rename handleCmdTrace
% interp hide {} name_1
% interp expose {} name_1 name_2
% info procs name*
name_2
%

--
   leunissen@       nl | Merge the left part of these two lines into one,
e.          hccnet.   | respecting a character's position in a line.

Add to del.icio.us | Digg this | Stumble it | Powered by Megasolutions Inc